On November 7, 2024, Donald J. Trump made history by becoming the second president in U.S. history to win non-consecutive terms. His victory was shocking to many around the world. Despite his controversial policies, divisive character, and ongoing legal battles, Trump managed to secure a second term. This win left people wondering how he pulled it off. In the months leading up to the election, Trump was facing serious legal challenges, including a high-profile conviction for 34 criminal charges in connection with falsifying business records. These charges stemmed from payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. The trial, which began in April 2024, concluded with Trump being found guilty on all counts by May 30, 2024.
Even with the conviction and a campaign clouded by legal troubles, Trump’s ability to connect with a large portion of the American electorate remained strong. The election also saw him go head-to-head with Kamala Harris, the U.S. Vice President and a former prosecutor. For Trump, winning a second term was vital, as he faced significant legal and political pressure. Despite the odds stacked against him, his win raised questions about the resilience of his political base and the broader state of American politics. How could such a deeply divisive figure continue to command such widespread support? The answer, perhaps, lies in the complex dynamics of American voters, their concerns, and the deeply rooted partisan divides that have shaped the U.S. political landscape.
A Timeline of Trump’s Extremely Controversial and Offensive Actions:
June 2015 (Campaign Launch)
Mexican Rapists Comment: Donald Trump made this remark during his campaign launch speech on June 16, 2015. He said, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” This was widely criticized as racist and xenophobic, marking the beginning of his hardline stance on immigration and his vow to build a border wall.
January - June 2016 (Campaign Trail)
Muslim Ban Proposal: On December 7, 2015, Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States. He later formalized this as a travel ban during his presidency, which sparked accusations of Islamophobia.
Mocking Disabled Reporter: During a rally in November 2015, Trump mocked Serge Kovaleski, a reporter from The New York Times, who has a disability. This incident was condemned for its insensitivity toward people with disabilities.
Criticism of Senator John McCain: In July 2015, Trump made his infamous comment about John McCain, saying, “I like people who weren’t captured,” in reference to McCain's imprisonment during the Vietnam War. This remark angered many veterans and those who respected McCain’s service.
July - September 2016
Khizr Khan Incident: At the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, Khizr Khan, the father of a fallen Muslim American soldier, criticized Trump. Trump responded by questioning why Khan’s wife, Ghazala Khan, didn’t speak at the convention, which many saw as disrespectful to military families.
Pussy-Grabbing Tape: In October 2016, a recording from 2005 surfaced, where Trump was heard saying “grab them by the pussy” in a conversation with Billy Bush. Trump later dismissed this as “locker room talk,” but it led to significant backlash, particularly for its sexual content.
Alicia Machado Comments: Trump’s comments about Miss Universe Alicia Machado, made during the 1996 Miss Universe pageant, were resurfaced in September 2016. He had referred to her as “Miss Piggy” for gaining weight after winning the title and also insulted her as “Miss Housekeeping” because of her Latina background. These remarks were condemned as both sexist and racist.
October - November 2016 (Late Campaign Actions)
Refusal to Accept Election Results: During the campaign and especially in the lead-up to Election Day in November 2016, Trump repeatedly stated that the election could be “rigged.” After his victory, he continued to promote false claims about widespread voter fraud, which is consistent with the rhetoric about not accepting the election results.
Encouraging Violence at Rallies: Trump made several remarks encouraging violence at his rallies. For example, at a rally in February 2016, he said, "I’d like to punch him in the face," referring to a protestor. Throughout the campaign, he also encouraged his supporters to remove protestors and even joked about roughing them up.
November - December 2016 (Post-Election)
Endorsing Conspiracy Theories: After winning the election in November 2016, Trump continued to endorse various conspiracy theories. For example, he falsely claimed that millions of illegal votes had been cast against him, despite no evidence supporting such a claim.
Trump University Settlement: In November 2016, Trump settled a $25 million lawsuit over his Trump University real estate seminars. The lawsuit claimed that the seminars had misled students, and the settlement resolved allegations of fraud.
2017
Muslim Ban (Executive Order 13769): Trump issues a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries, sparking protests and legal battles.
“Both Sides” Charlottesville Comments: After a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Trump says there were “very fine people on both sides,” which is condemned as racially insensitive.
Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord: Trump pulls the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement, drawing criticism from environmental groups.
Response to Puerto Rico's Hurricane Maria: Trump’s response to Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico is widely criticized as slow and inadequate.
Transgender Military Ban: Trump bans transgender individuals from serving in the military, which sparks accusations of discrimination.
2018
Family Separation Policy: Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy leads to the separation of migrant children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border, leading to widespread condemnation.
Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal Scandals: Trump is implicated in hush-money payments to two women, Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, who claim to have had affairs with him.
Mocking Dr. Christine Blasey Ford: Trump mocks Dr. Ford’s testimony about alleged sexual assault during Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court hearings.
“Shithole Countries” Comment: Trump reportedly refers to Haiti, El Salvador, and African nations as “shithole countries,” which is widely criticized as racist.
2019
Ukraine Scandal and Impeachment: Trump is accused of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden’s son while withholding military aid, leading to his first impeachment on charges of abuse of power.
“Go Back” Tweets: Trump tweets that four Democratic congresswomen of color should “go back” to their “broken” countries, which is criticized as racist.
Refusal to Condemn White Supremacy: Trump is criticized for his slow and unclear condemnation of white supremacy after incidents like the El Paso shooting and the Charlottesville rally.
Environmental Rollbacks: Trump rolls back environmental protections, weakening laws for clean air, water, and endangered species.
2020
COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Trump downplays the severity of the COVID-19 virus, promotes unproven ‘treatments’ (suggesting the use of bleach), and faces criticism for his response to the pandemic.
Lafayette Square Incident: Trump orders the clearing of peaceful protesters for a photo op with a Bible outside St. John’s Church, drawing accusations of authoritarianism.
Dismantling of the USPS: Changes to the U.S. Postal Service raise concerns about mail-in voting for the 2020 election.
Support for Conspiracy Theories: Trump amplifies conspiracy theories, including QAnon and claims of voter fraud.
Second Impeachment and Capitol Riot: After losing the 2020 election, Trump falsely claims it was “stolen” and incites the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol, leading to his second impeachment.
Additional Accusations and Controversies (Throughout 2016-2020)
Sexual Assault Allegations: Over 20 women accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, including rape, which he denies.
Praise for Dictators: Trump is criticized for praising authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un.
Attempts to Undermine Media: Trump repeatedly attacks the press, calling it “fake news” and labeling critical reporting as the “enemy of the people.”
Black Voters:
In the 2024 election, Trump gained unexpected support among Black voters in several key swing states. For example, he won a higher share of the Black vote in states like Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania compared to 2020, with Wisconsin showing the most notable shift—Black support for Trump rose by a huge 13 percentage points. While many Black voters still leaned heavily Democratic, with around 90 percent sticking with the party in some states, a noticeable number moved toward Trump, especially in areas where poverty and healthcare were major issues. This shift didn’t come out of nowhere: a 2023 Gallup poll found that fewer Black adults identified as Democrats than in 2020, and more young Black voters were choosing their party independently, rather than sticking with tradition.
Why Is This Shocking?
Donald Trump’s track record on race-related issues, particularly with Black communities, reveals a pattern of inflammatory remarks and policies that seem at odds with Black Americans’ interests. This makes the recent shift of Black voters toward Trump surprising. For instance, in 2017, after the Charlottesville rally where white supremacists clashed with counter-protesters, Trump commented that there were "very fine people on both sides." This response stirred outrage, as it was seen as a reluctance to condemn white nationalists explicitly. Similarly, during his 2016 campaign, Trump was asked if he condemned David Duke and the KKK, who have a violent history targeting Black Americans. Trump responded ambiguously, claiming he didn’t know enough about the KKK or Duke to take a stance—a statement widely criticized as evasive.
His actions during his presidency also raised concerns. Trump’s approach to law and order included increasing police funding without addressing concerns about accountability, even as the Black Lives Matter movement called attention to police brutality and systemic racism. His dismissal of BLM as a group that was "hurting the Black community" and "seeking to destroy the nuclear family" showed his strategy of using fear-mongering tactics. He ignored the context of BLM's anger—police brutality, lack of accountability, and racial disparities in justice. His rhetoric focused on painting BLM as violent, referring to their chants, like "pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon," as examples of anti-police sentiment. He didn’t address the roots of these sentiments, including cases where Black individuals were killed by police without accountability, which inflamed public outrage.
In addition, Trump attempted to roll back the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which has been critical for many Black Americans, who disproportionately face barriers to healthcare access. During COVID-19, Black Americans suffered higher mortality rates due to these healthcare inequities, compounded by their overrepresentation in frontline jobs. Trump’s response to the pandemic was criticized as sluggish and dismissive; he downplayed COVID-19's impact, even suggesting it would "just disappear," a stance that failed to address the vulnerabilities within Black communities.
Economically, Trump’s policies favored tax cuts for the wealthy, which did little to address the wage gaps and economic inequalities affecting Black Americans. He made dismissive and derogatory comments about African nations, referring to them as "shithole countries," and targeted Congress members of color with offensive rhetoric. His actions and remarks underscore a history of policies and statements that have stirred racial tensions, leading many to question the recent Black voter shift toward him despite his record.
Latino Voters:
The 2024 U.S. presidential election also saw a surprising uptick in Latino voter support for Donald Trump, an outcome that diverges from the Latino community’s traditional Democratic alignment. Approximately 36.2 million Latinos were projected to vote, and Trump’s increase in support among this demographic was a decisive factor in his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris. While more than half of Latino voters still supported Harris, Trump’s share marked a notable increase from 2020, where Biden captured around 60% of Latino voters. In states like Florida, where the Latino community is substantial, Trump led Harris by 56% to 43%, reflecting a trend of Republican gains among Latino voters since 2016.
Why Is This Shocking?
The shift of Latino voters towards Donald Trump in the 2024 U.S. election is particularly striking given his actions and policies that have directly targeted or harmed communities within this demographic. Trump’s treatment of Puerto Rico stands as one of the clearest examples of his disregard for vulnerable populations within the Latino community. After Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico in 2017, Trump’s response was widely criticized for its lack of empathy and ineffective aid efforts. In a visit to the island, Trump was seen tossing rolls of paper towels into a crowd of struggling residents, a gesture that many perceived as disrespectful and tone-deaf. The island had been severely affected by flooding, power outages, and food and water shortages, and his actions were seen as trivializing the hardship of Puerto Ricans. Furthermore, Trump’s administration was slow to provide the necessary relief, and his downplaying of the crisis in Puerto Rico—repeatedly claiming that the death toll was lower than reported—only added to the frustration and anger of many Puerto Ricans, both on the island and in the U.S. mainland.
This indifference towards Puerto Rico is compounded by Trump’s broader stance on immigration, an issue that resonates deeply within the Latino community, particularly among those from immigrant families. Throughout his presidency, Trump adopted a hostile approach to immigration, including the widely condemned "zero tolerance" policy, which resulted in the separation of thousands of children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border. This policy, which saw children placed in cages in overcrowded detention centers, drew widespread condemnation from human rights organizations, Democratic lawmakers, and even some Republicans. The images of crying children and parents being forcibly separated from their children became emblematic of the cruelty and inhumanity of Trump’s immigration policies. This action, coupled with the often derogatory language Trump used to describe immigrants—referring to them as "animals" and "rapists"—only served to further alienate many Latinos, particularly those from immigrant backgrounds who were directly impacted by such policies.
Another deeply troubling aspect of Trump’s presidency was his rhetoric towards Latino immigrants. Beyond his infamous "shithole countries" comment, Trump’s continued demonization of immigrants—especially from Latin America—fed into harmful stereotypes. He stoked fear about an "invasion" of immigrants from Latin America, a tactic that was used to justify harsh immigration laws and policies. His administration pushed for measures such as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which forced asylum seekers to wait in dangerous conditions in Mexico while their claims were processed in the U.S. These policies were particularly harmful to vulnerable populations, including women and children fleeing violence and persecution in their home countries. Trump’s rhetoric painted these individuals as criminals and threats to national security, further alienating the Latino community.
What makes this shift towards Trump among Latino voters so shocking is the stark contrast between his actions and the values that many Latinos hold dear. His disregard for Puerto Rico, hostile stance on immigration, attempts to strip away healthcare access, and failure to address systemic issues of racism and police brutality all suggest a deep indifference towards the well-being of Latino communities. Yet, despite this, a portion of the Latino electorate shifted toward him in 2024, driven in part by economic concerns, fear of socialism, and dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party’s handling of key issues. This complex, multifaceted shift is a testament to the evolving political landscape and the diversity of views within the Latino community, but it remains deeply troubling when considering the harm Trump’s actions have caused to many of its members.
Female Voters:
In the 2024 U.S. elections, a surprising number of female voters cast their ballots for Donald Trump, despite his long history of misogyny and the pivotal issue of abortion rights dominating the political landscape. While women as a whole tended to support Kamala Harris, Trump still managed to secure a significant portion of the female vote, particularly among white women and young women. His appeal to certain groups of women—especially those concerned about economic issues, immigration, and perceived threats from left-wing policies—helped him maintain a strong base. However, this support was also seen as a reflection of the deep polarization in American politics, with gender becoming a key factor in how women voted.
Why Is This Shocking?
This support from women, particularly those who previously championed women’s rights, raises a stark level of hypocrisy when considered alongside Trump’s actions that directly targeted women’s rights. Trump’s Supreme Court appointments were instrumental in the overturning of Roe v. Wade, stripping millions of women of their constitutional right to abortion. Despite many women declaring “my body, my rights” during the fight for reproductive autonomy, a significant portion of the female electorate still voted for the man who engineered this loss. This glaring contradiction has drawn questions about the true priorities of some women voters. Trump's consistent actions against women’s rights didn’t end with abortion. His administration also made attempts to roll back the Violence Against Women Act, which funds services for survivors of domestic violence, and he weakened policies aimed at addressing sexual harassment in the workplace. Furthermore, Trump’s rhetoric toward women, from his objectification of women in the public sphere to his controversial comments about women’s physical appearances, has consistently undermined the progress made in gender equality. For many, it is hard to reconcile supporting a candidate whose policies have repeatedly targeted women's autonomy and safety with the broader feminist ideals of equality and bodily integrity. Where was the outrage among those who voted for him, especially when the rights of women were so directly at stake?
Working-Class People:
It is particularly shocking that many working-class people voted for a wealthy, convicted felon like Donald Trump, given the apparent contradiction between his background and the interests of the very voters who supported him. For years, the working class has faced stagnant wages, job insecurity, and growing economic inequality, while Trump’s wealth and history of business practices seem to represent the very elite they often feel left behind by. His conviction on criminal charges related to financial misconduct, as well as his history of using loopholes to avoid taxes, further alienates him from the struggles of everyday working Americans. Yet, many voters chose to support him, perhaps driven by a sense of frustration with the political establishment and a desire for change, regardless of his personal flaws. Trump’s populist rhetoric, which blamed elites and immigrants for many of the country’s problems, resonated with a segment of the working class that felt economically disenfranchised. His focus on issues like job creation, national pride, and immigration reform may have created a sense of hope, convincing voters that his outsider status—despite his wealth—made him the ideal candidate to shake up a system they felt had long ignored them. This paradox shows how deeply dissatisfaction with traditional politics can shape voting decisions, even if the candidate’s personal life and history run counter to the values or needs of the electorate.
A Convicted Criminal Over a Prosecutor:
In the 2024 U.S. election, Donald Trump, a convicted criminal, triumphed over Kamala Harris, a seasoned prosecutor with a reputation for putting criminals behind bars. Trump, who had been convicted in a series of legal battles, including for his involvement in orchestrating the January 6th Capitol riot and various financial and business-related crimes, faced 34 charges related to falsifying business records in a scheme involving payments to Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Despite being convicted in May 2024, Trump garnered significant support from voters. In contrast, Harris, a former District Attorney in San Francisco and later California's Attorney General, had built her career by prosecuting criminal enterprises and working on criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing recidivism and improving rehabilitation. Her early career began in 1990 as a deputy district attorney in Alameda County, where she was known as "an able prosecutor on the way up." Yet, despite her background in law enforcement and her advocacy for justice, voters chose Trump, a man convicted of serious crimes, over her. This outcome highlights the deep hypocrisy within the idea of the American Dream. Harris, who worked tirelessly to uphold the rule of law, lost to a man who was legally condemned for his illegal actions, demonstrating how personal loyalty, populism, and dissatisfaction with the political system can eclipse the values of integrity and justice. The result underscores a profound enigma in the American electorate, where a criminal with a tarnished past can outshine a public servant who has devoted her life to prosecuting criminals.
Patriarchy At Its Finest:
The 2024 U.S. election laid bare the persistence of patriarchy in America, as the nation chose a convicted criminal, Donald Trump, over Kamala Harris, who had the potential to become the first female president. This choice speaks volumes about the entrenched gender biases that continue to shape American politics. Despite Harris’s remarkable rise as the first woman of color to serve as Vice President, her path to the presidency was blocked by a man with a documented history of misogyny, criminality, and divisiveness.
Trump’s election, in many ways, reflects the harsh reality that patriarchy is alive and well in the United States, where the idea of a woman in power remains a hard sell to many voters. Harris’s candidacy symbolized a step forward for gender equality, yet the electorate, particularly certain key demographics, refused to make that leap. In fact, a man with a criminal past, someone who had previously disparaged women, was able to secure the support of many who should have been outraged by his history of undermining women’s rights and dignity.
This outcome is a stark reminder of how deeply ingrained patriarchal structures are in American politics. It’s not just about rejecting a woman leader; it’s about choosing a man who has openly belittled and objectified women over a woman who has spent her career fighting for justice, equality, and rights for all. The fact that Trump, despite his record, still found a strong base of support, illustrates how far American society still has to go in overcoming the prejudices that dictate who gets to hold power. The 2024 election thus serves as a painful reflection of how much the battle for gender equality in politics remains unresolved.
Land of the Hypocrites:
America often portrays itself as the "land of the free, home of the brave, and the greatest country in the world." However, when viewed through the lens of its political choices, these lofty ideals ring hollow. The election of a convicted criminal over a qualified, accomplished woman of color demonstrates how deeply hypocrisy runs in the nation’s foundations. How can a country that claims to champion freedom and equality justify the continued marginalization of women, especially women of color, in positions of power? How can it celebrate bravery when it rejects a woman who has spent her career fighting for justice, only to elect a man with a history of undermining those very ideals? The unfortunate reality is that, for all its self-proclaimed greatness, America’s actions in the 2024 election expose a nation still shackled by sexism, racial inequality, and a dangerous preference for the status quo, no matter how flawed or harmful it may be. Far from being the greatest country, America’s treatment of its women and marginalized groups shows just how far it still has to go.
A Disturbing Precedent:
Trump’s victory in 2024 could set a troubling precedent for future politicians, especially in terms of the tactics they might adopt to secure votes. His ability to win despite facing multiple legal challenges and perpetuating divisive rhetoric suggests that unconventional, populist strategies can resonate with large segments of the electorate. His campaign leveraged culture wars, fear-based messaging, and a disregard for political norms, which not only polarized voters but also galvanized a strong, loyal base. This could inspire future candidates to embrace similarly provocative and controversial actions, believing that they can create a fervent support base capable of overcoming scandal and public backlash. The normalization of undermining democratic processes, stoking divisive sentiments, and attacking institutions may encourage politicians to prioritize short-term electoral gains over long-term stability and unity. Ultimately, Trump’s win exemplifies how a candidate can exploit the system and public sentiment, leading to a more fractured, polarized political landscape where style often trumps substance.
Project 2025: The American Future
Project 2025 is a plan by conservative groups in the U.S. to push for more conservative policies in the government. It's focused on preparing for the 2024 election and making sure that conservative ideas are strongly represented in government jobs, laws, and policies. The goal is to influence how the government works, particularly in areas like the economy, foreign policy, and social issues, by promoting right-wing values. It’s closely tied to the political movement around Donald Trump and his supporters.
Project 2025's Potential Impact on Marginalized Voters
Project 2025 has been heavily criticized for its authoritarian ambitions and regressive policies that could severely harm historically marginalized groups, including female voters, Black Americans, Latinos, and the working class. One of its key objectives—the rollback of civil rights protections and the undermining of social safety nets—directly threatens these communities. For women, particularly those advocating for reproductive rights, Project 2025’s push to restrict abortion access and dismantle the Respect for Marriage Act is a blatant assault on gender equality and personal autonomy. The project aligns closely with a far-right Christian nationalist agenda, seeking to erode the legal and social advancements women have fought for over decades. The erasure of LGBTQ+ rights and the promotion of a Christian nationalist framework only further solidify the project's harmful impact on women who benefit from the protections afforded by civil rights legislation.
For Black and Latino voters, the project’s tendency to prioritize white Christian nationalism and its rhetoric around eradicating "woke" values suggests an underlying dismissal of the very real struggles faced by communities of color. Many of these communities have historically relied on progressive policies to address systemic racism, improve healthcare access, and promote economic equality. By proposing the gutting of programs aimed at reducing income inequality and advancing racial justice, Project 2025 would disproportionately impact Black and Latino populations, further entrenching their socio-economic disadvantage. The project’s racially coded language, such as framing LGBTQ+ rights and progressive social policies as a threat to family values, has a clear connection to white supremacist ideologies and xenophobic sentiments, pushing policies that marginalize immigrants and people of color.
Moreover, working-class voters, who face ongoing struggles with rising healthcare costs, stagnant wages, and economic instability, are deeply at risk under the implementation of Project 2025. Its focus on centralizing power in the executive branch and curtailing social welfare programs in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy will likely increase the economic inequalities already facing this demographic. The project promises a rollback of labor rights protections and worker's benefits, making it harder for the working class to organize and secure fair wages. Ironically, many working-class individuals, who could be the most negatively affected by Project 2025’s regressive economic policies, have continued to support Trump due to his populist rhetoric. Yet, this support seems rooted more in cultural issues and economic anxiety than a clear understanding of how these policies harm their long-term interests.
The Surprising Support for Trump Among These Groups
What is truly perplexing is how marginalized demographics, who stand to lose the most under the proposed policies of Project 2025, have continued to vote for Donald Trump and his brand of politics. Female voters, especially those who support reproductive rights, are aligned with the very policies and ideologies that Trump’s agenda seeks to dismantle. Black and Latino voters, who have historically been targeted by discriminatory policies and rhetoric, find themselves backing a candidate whose policies continue to exacerbate racial disparities. Working-class voters, while attracted to Trump’s populist language, often overlook how his actual policies—such as cutting social safety nets and undermining labor protections—serve to perpetuate the economic inequality they face.
These voting patterns suggest a deep cultural and emotional appeal that transcends policy analysis. Many voters feel disenfranchised by a political establishment they believe has ignored their concerns, and they view Trump as a figure who challenges the status quo, regardless of how his policies might harm their communities in the long run. This dynamic speaks to a larger disconnect between policy benefits and voter support—many voters are drawn to Trump’s rhetoric of rebellion, nationalism, and cultural conservatism, even when it is evident that his policies will disproportionately harm their own interests.
The fact that these disadvantaged groups continue to support a candidate whose policies harm them shows the power of identity politics and the deep divisions within American society. Trump’s ability to tap into a sense of cultural grievance and fear, particularly among voters who feel left behind by globalization and progressive social change, has allowed him to secure support from those who should logically be his staunchest critics. This paradox highlights the enduring appeal of Trump’s brand of populism—one that promises to restore a vision of America that, for many marginalized groups, is deeply rooted in exclusion and inequality.
For More Information, go over the articles and videos below:
US election 2024 results: How Black voters shifted towards Trump
What did Donald Trump say about the KKK?
Trump: Black Lives Matter is 'hurting the black community'
Record number of children being held at the U.S.-Mexico border
US election: Did Trump gain Latino vote despite ‘floating garbage’ jibe?
Trump makes gains among Black voters
They’re rapists.’ President Trump’s campaign launch speech two years later, annotated
Donald Trump under fire for mocking disabled reporter
Donald Trump Criticizes Muslim Family of Slain U.S. Soldier, Drawing Ire
Trump Gets Caught Saying "Grab Her by the Pussy"
Alicia Machado, Miss Universe weight-shamed by Trump, speaks out for Clinton
Trump vows to expand Muslim ban and bar Gaza refugees if he wins presidency
Trump throws paper towels into crowd in Puerto Rico
United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement
The Trump Administration’s Transgender Military Ban
President Donald Trump Calls Haiti And African Countries 'Shithole' Nations | NBC Nightly News
Trump impeachment explained - BBC News
President Trump on rising COVID-19 cases
President Donald Trump and Impeachable Offenses
The 26 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct
Fact Check: Did Donald Trump ever mention ending the Affordable Care Act?
Project 2025: The right-wing wish list for another Trump presidency
If this information was informative and educative, consider subscribing to the newsletter by pressing the subscribe button below:
Feel free to share this information with others by pressing the share button below:
Also engage in discussions by leaving comments below:
Your participation contributes to the collaborative and dynamic nature of the newsletter, creating a space for shared knowledge and diverse perspectives.